
Updated:
MASS MoCA
Not Inclusive
Behind the Frame
Behind the Frame evaluates 40 of the nation's leading art museums across three areas: their policies, their representation of Jewish art and artists and their partnerships and community engagement. These criteria assess a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism. Collections and exhibitions reflect long-lead decisions museums plan five to ten years in advance, while policies and inclusion practices signal how prepared an institution is for the future and the evolving nature of antisemitism. Each museum receives a rating — from Critical Condition to Gold Standard — based on how it measures up.
As the ADL Center on Extremism has documented, extremist activists have facilitated coordinated efforts since October 7, 2023 to push Jewish and Israeli voices out of mainstream cultural spaces, with the impact felt at the staff, curator and visitor levels. Most American museums hold significant collections of Jewish art, but owning the work is not enough. Policies, programming and inclusion commitments must protect and feature Jewish artists, staff and patrons amid rising antisemitism. These criteria assess both a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism.

Back
Gold Standard
Good Showing
Work In Progress
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient

Updated:
Not Inclusive
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient
Work In Progress
MASS MoCA is a contemporary art museum and performing arts center in North Adams, Massachusetts, housed in a vast former industrial complex. Opened in 1999, it is especially known for large-scale and long-term installations that would be difficult to present in conventional museum galleries, as well as a multidisciplinary performance program.
Jewish representation is present but not deep. Sol LeWitt’s long-term wall-drawing installation provides a visible Jewish artist presence, and the collection provides more than a purely minimal level of Jewish representation. The supporting research did not identify a dedicated Jewish exhibition during the scoring window.
Israeli representation is a larger gap. Izhar Patkin’s The Wandering Veil was a major relevant installation, but it ended before the ten-year research window. No comparable Israeli artist presentation was verified in the current period.
Visitors can access general contact channels and a public anti-discrimination values statement, but the research did not identify a specific mechanism for reporting bias incidents. No public policy was found that explicitly prohibits antisemitism, and no sufficiently clear protest and solicitation policy was identified.
MASS MoCA has engaged the Jewish community through a 2017 program with the Jewish Federation of the Berkshires, creating a genuine institutional relationship. It also presented Alex Edelman’s Just for Us, a performance centered on antisemitism and Jewish identity. These examples show that Jewish content has appeared through public programming even where the exhibition record is thinner.
The museum does not generally recognize heritage months, so Jewish American Heritage Month is not separately scored.
MASS MoCA’s positive examples of Jewish engagement are limited and outweighed by broader institutional weaknesses. Israeli representation is effectively absent in the current scoring window, Jewish-focused exhibitions and programming are not sustained, and the museum lacks a dedicated bias-reporting mechanism, explicit antisemitism protections and clear protest and solicitation policies. These gaps leave its overall approach fragmented.
State of the Arts becomes an accessible public home for research, profiles, storytelling, and advocacy that can continue to grow over time.
If you are an artist, writer, performer or member of the arts and culture community who has experienced or witnessed antisemitism, bias or discrimination, please Report an Incident to ADL. If you are seeking legal support, you can also submit a request to ADL’s Legal Action Network.