
Updated:
Museum of Modern Art (MoMA)
Good Showing
Behind the Frame
Behind the Frame evaluates 40 of the nation's leading art museums across three areas: their policies, their representation of Jewish art and artists and their partnerships and community engagement. These criteria assess a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism. Collections and exhibitions reflect long-lead decisions museums plan five to ten years in advance, while policies and inclusion practices signal how prepared an institution is for the future and the evolving nature of antisemitism. Each museum receives a rating — from Critical Condition to Gold Standard — based on how it measures up.
As the ADL Center on Extremism has documented, extremist activists have facilitated coordinated efforts since October 7, 2023 to push Jewish and Israeli voices out of mainstream cultural spaces, with the impact felt at the staff, curator and visitor levels. Most American museums hold significant collections of Jewish art, but owning the work is not enough. Policies, programming and inclusion commitments must protect and feature Jewish artists, staff and patrons amid rising antisemitism. These criteria assess both a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism.

Back
Gold Standard
Good Showing
Work In Progress
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient

Updated:
Good Showing
Not Inclusive
Good Showing
Work In Progress
*Points deducted for problematic incidents.
The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), located in Midtown Manhattan, was founded in 1929 as an institution devoted to the art of the modern era. Its collection spans painting and sculpture, photography, film, architecture and design, prints, drawings, media, and performance, making it one of the most influential modern and contemporary art museums in the world.
Representation is one of MoMA’s strongest areas. Its holdings include substantial work by Jewish artists and Jewish-themed works, including pieces by Marc Chagall, Deborah Kass, Elaine Lustig Cohen, and others. Israeli artists are also well represented, including Michal Rovner, Yael Bartana, Sigalit Landau, and several artists whose work has appeared in exhibitions or film programming during the past decade.
MoMA also publishes a provenance research project explicitly focused on Holocaust- and Nazi-era ownership questions. For a contemporary museum, where Nazi-era provenance research is not part of the standard score, this stands out against peer institutions as a particularly strong transparency practice.
MoMA’s visitor guidelines provide strong, content-neutral rules around political activity in the museum, including restrictions on leafleting, signature gathering, picketing, charitable solicitation, and press conferences. Those rules give the museum a clear framework for preventing disruption inside the galleries.
The most visible gap is accountability for bias and discrimination. Visitors can reach the museum through general contact channels, but there is no clearly identified public mechanism for reporting a bias or antisemitism incident. No public evidence was found of a policy explicitly prohibiting antisemitism. A more visible reporting pathway and clearer public protections would strengthen an otherwise well-developed institutional framework.
MoMA has built a sustained record of Jewish-focused programming, including a 2026 offsite tour at the Jewish Museum, a residency conversation engaging Jewish memory in Kaunas, a multi-part performance lecture drawing on Sukkot, and film programming connected to Jewish and Israeli identity. Its direct institutional partnership record is more limited, but its recent collaboration with the Jewish Museum demonstrates a pathway for deeper engagement.
MoMA recognizes several other heritage and affinity months but has historically not recognized Jewish American Heritage Month.
MoMA has faced some anti-Israel activism from employees and protesters. A February 2024 employee letter called for an unconditional ceasefire and consideration of Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) boycott principles. That same month, more than 500 protesters occupied the museum’s atrium, accused trustees of supporting “genocide, apartheid, and settler colonialism,” and prompted MoMA to close for the remainder of the day. Later that year, protesters demonstrated outside the museum during a World Jewish Congress event honoring Ronald Lauder, MoMA’s Honorary Board Chair.
MoMA shows that a contemporary museum can meaningfully represent Jewish and Israeli artists and also create substantive Jewish cultural programming. Its next step is institutional: clearer reporting, more explicit antisemitism protections, deeper Jewish organizational partnerships, and Jewish American Heritage Month recognition would bring its policies and public engagement closer to the strength of its artistic record.
State of the Arts becomes an accessible public home for research, profiles, storytelling, and advocacy that can continue to grow over time.
If you are an artist, writer, performer or member of the arts and culture community who has experienced or witnessed antisemitism, bias or discrimination, please Report an Incident to ADL. If you are seeking legal support, you can also submit a request to ADL’s Legal Action Network.