
Updated:
Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (MOCA)
Critically Deficient
Behind the Frame
Behind the Frame evaluates 40 of the nation's leading art museums across three areas: their policies, their representation of Jewish art and artists and their partnerships and community engagement. These criteria assess a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism. Collections and exhibitions reflect long-lead decisions museums plan five to ten years in advance, while policies and inclusion practices signal how prepared an institution is for the future and the evolving nature of antisemitism. Each museum receives a rating — from Critical Condition to Gold Standard — based on how it measures up.
As the ADL Center on Extremism has documented, extremist activists have facilitated coordinated efforts since October 7, 2023 to push Jewish and Israeli voices out of mainstream cultural spaces, with the impact felt at the staff, curator and visitor levels. Most American museums hold significant collections of Jewish art, but owning the work is not enough. Policies, programming and inclusion commitments must protect and feature Jewish artists, staff and patrons amid rising antisemitism. These criteria assess both a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism.

Back
Gold Standard
Good Showing
Work In Progress
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient

Updated:
Critically Deficient
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient
Critically Deficient
The Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles (MOCA) was founded in 1979 and is dedicated to art produced since 1940. With venues in downtown Los Angeles, MOCA has built an internationally recognized collection of postwar and contemporary art and has played a central role in documenting and presenting the city’s own contemporary art history.
MOCA holds a meaningful group of works by Jewish artists and works engaging Jewish themes, including pieces connected to Kabbalah, Hebrew text, Yom Kippur, and Jerusalem. That material gives the museum a foundation for stronger Jewish interpretation and exhibition work.
Israeli representation is a much larger gap. The research did not verify Israeli artists in the collection or exhibition history during the scoring window.
MOCA has strong visitor conduct rules that prohibit demonstrations, signature gathering, and solicitation, giving it a clear content-neutral framework for political activity in museum spaces.
Its reporting infrastructure is much less clear: the museum lists multiple general contact emails, but there is no obvious public pathway specifically for bias or discrimination complaints.
No public policy was found that explicitly prohibits antisemitism.
No sustained Jewish institutional partnerships or Jewish educational programs were identified. MOCA also does not generally recognize heritage months, so Jewish American Heritage Month is not separately scored as an omission under the methodology.
MOCA has some meaningful Jewish material in its collection and strong rules around demonstrations, but the broader ecosystem is thin. Building Israeli artist representation, direct relationships with Jewish cultural organizations, substantive programming, and a clear bias-reporting process would move the museum from isolated strengths toward a more coherent approach.
State of the Arts becomes an accessible public home for research, profiles, storytelling, and advocacy that can continue to grow over time.
If you are an artist, writer, performer or member of the arts and culture community who has experienced or witnessed antisemitism, bias or discrimination, please Report an Incident to ADL. If you are seeking legal support, you can also submit a request to ADL’s Legal Action Network.