
Updated:
Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago (MCA)
Not Inclusive
Behind the Frame
Behind the Frame evaluates 40 of the nation's leading art museums across three areas: their policies, their representation of Jewish art and artists and their partnerships and community engagement. These criteria assess a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism. Collections and exhibitions reflect long-lead decisions museums plan five to ten years in advance, while policies and inclusion practices signal how prepared an institution is for the future and the evolving nature of antisemitism. Each museum receives a rating — from Critical Condition to Gold Standard — based on how it measures up.
As the ADL Center on Extremism has documented, extremist activists have facilitated coordinated efforts since October 7, 2023 to push Jewish and Israeli voices out of mainstream cultural spaces, with the impact felt at the staff, curator and visitor levels. Most American museums hold significant collections of Jewish art, but owning the work is not enough. Policies, programming and inclusion commitments must protect and feature Jewish artists, staff and patrons amid rising antisemitism. These criteria assess both a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism.

Back
Gold Standard
Good Showing
Work In Progress
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient

Updated:
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient
Gold Standard
Critically Deficient
The Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, founded in 1967, is one of the country’s major institutions devoted to contemporary art. Located near Chicago’s Magnificent Mile, the MCA collects and presents art from the postwar period to the present and is known for an interdisciplinary program spanning visual art, performance, and public programming.
MCA’s collection includes substantial work by Jewish artists, including R.B. Kitaj, Andy Warhol’s Ten Portraits of Jews of the Twentieth Century, Michael Rakowitz, Joel Shapiro, and others. Jewish representation is one of the museum’s strongest areas.
Israeli representation is equally notable. Chicago Works: Assaf Evron was the artist’s first solo U.S. museum exhibition and included new work connected to Israeli sites and landscapes. The exhibition was supported by Artis, creating a clear example of both Israeli representation and institutional collaboration.
Visitors can reach the museum through general channels, but the research did not identify a dedicated public mechanism for reporting bias or discrimination.
No public policy was found that explicitly prohibits antisemitism, and no sufficiently robust protest and solicitation policy was identified.
Strengthening those areas would give the museum clearer tools for responding when controversy moves from expression into harassment or exclusion.
The Artis support for the Evron exhibition gives MCA a meaningful Jewish/Israeli institutional partnership. Yet, other examples of partnerships were not identified in the assessment.
In addition, no Jewish educational programming was found.
MCA recognizes other heritage months but has historically not recognized Jewish American Heritage Month.
MCA’s Jewish and Israeli representation is undermined by significant gaps in the broader institutional framework. The museum lacks dedicated bias-reporting and antisemitism protections, has weak public protest and solicitation standards, offers no Jewish educational programming, and has historically failed to recognize Jewish American Heritage Month. These shortcomings keep an otherwise strong curatorial record from amounting to a genuinely inclusive approach.
State of the Arts becomes an accessible public home for research, profiles, storytelling, and advocacy that can continue to grow over time.
If you are an artist, writer, performer or member of the arts and culture community who has experienced or witnessed antisemitism, bias or discrimination, please Report an Incident to ADL. If you are seeking legal support, you can also submit a request to ADL’s Legal Action Network.