
Updated:
Philadelphia Museum of Art
Critically Deficient
Behind the Frame
Behind the Frame evaluates 40 of the nation's leading art museums across three areas: their policies, their representation of Jewish art and artists and their partnerships and community engagement. These criteria assess a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism. Collections and exhibitions reflect long-lead decisions museums plan five to ten years in advance, while policies and inclusion practices signal how prepared an institution is for the future and the evolving nature of antisemitism. Each museum receives a rating — from Critical Condition to Gold Standard — based on how it measures up.
As the ADL Center on Extremism has documented, extremist activists have facilitated coordinated efforts since October 7, 2023 to push Jewish and Israeli voices out of mainstream cultural spaces, with the impact felt at the staff, curator and visitor levels. Most American museums hold significant collections of Jewish art, but owning the work is not enough. Policies, programming and inclusion commitments must protect and feature Jewish artists, staff and patrons amid rising antisemitism. These criteria assess both a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism.

Back
Gold Standard
Good Showing
Work In Progress
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient

Updated:
Critically Deficient
Critically Deficient
Good Showing
Critically Deficient
The Philadelphia Museum of Art is an encyclopedic museum with roots in the 1876 Centennial Exhibition and a landmark main building overlooking the Benjamin Franklin Parkway. The main museum building was completed in 1928. Its collection spans more than two millennia and includes major holdings in European and American painting, Asian art, decorative arts, prints, drawings, and modern and contemporary art.
Israeli representation is the museum’s only clear major strength. The museum presented Yael Bartana’s And Europe Will Be Stunned as a dedicated exhibition, later acquired the trilogy, debuted The Undertaker, and commissioned Bartana’s first U.S. public performance.
Jewish representation is present but more modest.
The museum also maintains a strong Nazi-era provenance program under American Alliance of Museums (AAM) standards and publishes information on works that changed hands in continental Europe during 1933–45.
The museum provides general information contacts but no dedicated public mechanism for reporting bias or discrimination. No public policy was found that explicitly prohibits antisemitism, and no sufficiently clear protest and solicitation policy was identified, leaving significant room to strengthen institutional safeguards.
The research did not identify a true Jewish institutional partnership, even though Philadelphia is home to major Jewish cultural institutions. The museum did present Interfaith Philadelphia tours that included substantive Jewish content, providing some educational-programming credit.
The museum recognizes several other heritage months but has historically not recognized Jewish American Heritage Month.
PMA’s strong Israeli representation is outweighed by broader institutional deficiencies. Jewish representation and programming remain limited, no sustained Jewish institutional partnerships were identified, Jewish American Heritage Month has historically gone unrecognized, and key safeguards around bias reporting, antisemitism, and protest activity are absent. These gaps support a critically deficient assessment.
State of the Arts becomes an accessible public home for research, profiles, storytelling, and advocacy that can continue to grow over time.
If you are an artist, writer, performer or member of the arts and culture community who has experienced or witnessed antisemitism, bias or discrimination, please Report an Incident to ADL. If you are seeking legal support, you can also submit a request to ADL’s Legal Action Network.