
Updated:
National Gallery of Art
Good Showing
Behind the Frame
Behind the Frame evaluates 40 of the nation's leading art museums across three areas: their policies, their representation of Jewish art and artists and their partnerships and community engagement. These criteria assess a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism. Collections and exhibitions reflect long-lead decisions museums plan five to ten years in advance, while policies and inclusion practices signal how prepared an institution is for the future and the evolving nature of antisemitism. Each museum receives a rating — from Critical Condition to Gold Standard — based on how it measures up.
As the ADL Center on Extremism has documented, extremist activists have facilitated coordinated efforts since October 7, 2023 to push Jewish and Israeli voices out of mainstream cultural spaces, with the impact felt at the staff, curator and visitor levels. Most American museums hold significant collections of Jewish art, but owning the work is not enough. Policies, programming and inclusion commitments must protect and feature Jewish artists, staff and patrons amid rising antisemitism. These criteria assess both a museum’s record and its current approach to addressing antisemitism.

Back
Gold Standard
Good Showing
Work In Progress
Not Inclusive
Critically Deficient

Updated:
Good Showing
Good Showing
Gold Standard
Not Inclusive
The National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., was established through the gift of financier and collector Andrew W. Mellon and opened to the public in 1941. Located on the National Mall, it houses the nation’s collection of Western art from the medieval period to the present across the West Building, East Building, and Sculpture Garden.
Jewish and Israeli representation are both major strengths in the museum’s assessment. Its holdings include numerous Jewish artists, Jewish-themed works, Holocaust-related material, and Israeli artists including Michal Rovner.
Provenance is another major strength. NGA maintains a World War II-era provenance program and houses important archival material connected to the Munich Central Collecting Point.
NGA has strong content-neutral rules governing demonstrations, picketing, speechmaking, vigils, and related conduct, giving it a well-developed framework for political activity. It also receives credit for anti-discrimination training and for policies naming protected categories, though not antisemitism itself.
The National Gallery issues a memo three times a year informing staff of internal reporting options. Yet, visitors are still directed primarily to general contact information rather than a dedicated reporting mechanism for bias incidents.
Jewish-focused educational programming includes a discussion around Maintenance Artist and the Jewish tradition shaping Mierle Laderman Ukeles’s work, with additional programs including the Washington Jewish Film Festival and Jacob Kainen Art Trust, and multiple talks with or about Jewish artists. Direct partnerships with Jewish institutions remain comparatively limited.
NGA has the artistic and institutional depth to be a leader on Jewish inclusion. More direct Jewish partnerships, explicit language prohibiting antisemitism, and a visible reporting mechanism would align its policies and community engagement with the strength of its representation and provenance work.
State of the Arts becomes an accessible public home for research, profiles, storytelling, and advocacy that can continue to grow over time.
If you are an artist, writer, performer or member of the arts and culture community who has experienced or witnessed antisemitism, bias or discrimination, please Report an Incident to ADL. If you are seeking legal support, you can also submit a request to ADL’s Legal Action Network.